This Innovate Model has Exciting Potential and is Gaining Momentum, but it Requires Embracing Change in Order to Succeed
Many educators (myself included) are exciting about the possibilities that Competency Based Education has to offer. The idea of providing a more flexible approach to learning and degree attainment, when carefully implemented, is probably the most promising and fundamental potential change to the way that education is delivered and consumed that has come along since distance learning. Enabling students to more quickly move forward as they master learning material, and potentially even reduce the cost of higher education tuition, sounds like a no-brainer. But alas, it just ain’t that simple is it?
What is CBE?
In the EDUCAUSE article, “7 Things You Should Know About Competency-Based Education”, we learn that:
“Competency-based education (CBE) awards academic credit based on mastery of clearly defined competencies. CBE replaces the conventional model in which time is fixed and learning is variable with a model in which the time is variable and the learning is fixed. CBE is built around clearly defined competencies and measurable learning objectives that demonstrate mastery of those competencies. Measuring learning by competency is not new, but various challenges facing higher education, combined with new models and technologies, have brought a new focus on CBE. A growing number of competency-based programs have been developed at all levels of instruction. CBE capitalizes on the potential of online learning, enabling new models that can reduce both the cost and time needed to earn credentials while better preparing students for their professional lives.”
It should be added, for clarity’s sake, that CBE is often implemented with significant reliance on technology too help facilitate assessment, delivery, and more.
Hurdles and Barriers
There are numerous challenges that CBE faces in order to experience a higher rate of successful adoption.
First, of course, is the hurdle of the Carnegie unit, i.e. “seat time”, a fundamental part of the education model here in the U.S. The Carnegie unit is the core unit around which credit hours are measured. Wikipedia offers a good overview (and some history) as well:
“The Carnegie Unit and the Student Hour (also called a Credit Hour) are strictly time-based references for measuring educational attainment used by American universities and colleges; the Carnegie Unit assesses secondary school attainment, and the Student Hour, derived from the Carnegie Unit, assesses collegiate attainment.
Per its original definition, the Carnegie Unit is 120 hours of class or contact time with an instructor over the course of a year at the secondary (American high school) level. Strictly speaking, this breaks down into a single one-hour meeting, on each of five days per week for a total of 24 weeks per year. However, knowing that classes usually meet for 50 minutes yields a value of 30 weeks per year. However, further complicating the computation is the fact that American schools typically meet 180 days, or 36 academic weeks, a year. A semester (one-half of a full year) earns 1/2 a Carnegie Unit.
The Student Hour is approximately 12 hours of class or contact time, approximately 1/10 of the Carnegie Unit (as explained below). As it is used today, a Student Hour is the equivalent of one hour (50 minutes) of lecture time for a single student per week over the course of a semester, usually 14 to 16 weeks.”
So this is the first challenge – getting regulators to agree to allow schools to dispense with the Carnegie unit in favor of a CBE approach. The good news is that this has happened in a few cases, at both the high school and higher education level. Western Governors University is one of several accredited institutions of higher education built around Competency Based Education (and several other innovations) and it is considered by many to be a success.
At the high school level, the state of New Hampshire offers a lesson in displacing seat time with competency. In 2005, the state tossed out the Carnegie unit, and they mandated that all high schools move to a competency-based model by the 2008-09 school year. But even when that barrier is dropped, successful CBE is far from just a throw of a switch. Schools need to think and act differently in order to implement CBE in a meaningful, impactful way. As is so often the case with a government mandated change, simply forcing a group of people of organizations to follow new rules does not equate to success – without careful planning, messaging, guidance, and execution, any such mandate is assured its share of failure.
Julia Freeland recently wrote about New Hampshire’s transition in her article, “Barriers to Competency- Based Innovation Aren’t Just Coming from Above”. Discussing what happened when NH made this ground breaking change, “forcing” everyone to a CBE model,
“Some schools ran with the concept of competency-based education, undoing the age-old practices that benchmarked progress against time rather than learning. This subset of schools shifted their grading and testing policies to better reflect mastery, provided supplemental content for students falling behind or moving ahead, and made assessment more frequent and formative. Other schools, however, have remained very much the same. Even though many New Hampshire high schools today may have documents titled “competencies” in their classrooms and student handbooks or offer competency recovery to students falling behind, they have maintained the trappings of a time-based system, where students continue to move through material regardless of mastery and at a course-wide pace regardless of individual ability.”
The fact is, “transforming from a time-based to a competency-based system upends the traditional culture, structure, and schedule in schools and districts. Moreover, this work requires innovative restructuring that school systems, by their very architecture, are not designed to undertake.” Just because a governing body says everyone has to change, doesn’t make it so. (It blows my mind that in this enlightened age, governments at all levels think that setting some sort of rule equates to a productive outcome. Has no one in government ever heard of “change management”?).
Another barrier worth noting is the lag of technology for CBE. While in many ways, tech is often ahead of the curve, this is not the case with Competency Based Education. Ms. Freeland has also published a great piece on this topic: “Technology Tools Lag Our Competency- Based Aspirations”. In brief, Freeland explains that the ed tech product market has a long way to go to offer robust solutions that facilitate Competency Based Education.
… on Tuesday we’ll continue this look at Competency Based Education, examining some pioneers and success stories and taking a look at what’s next for CBE. Please come back and join us!
Related Posts (if the above topic is of interest, you might want to check these out):
Western Governors University – Measurable Academic Innovation Success, Enabled by Technology
Can the Inspiration for Learning be Captured and Empowered Through Technology?
Interview with Education Technology Thought Leader Terry Heick of TeachThought
Authors, M. (n.d.). Carnegie Unit and Student Hour. Retrieved March 16, 2014, from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnegie_Unit_and_Student_Hour
EDUCAUSE. (2014, February 11). 7 Things You Should Know About Competency-Based Education. Retrieved from EDUCAUSE: http://www.educause.edu/library/resources/7-things-you-should-know-about-competency-based-education
Freeland, J. (2013, November 25). Barriers to Competency- Based Innovation Aren’t Just Coming from Above. Retrieved from EducationNext: http://educationnext.org/barriers-to-competency-based-innovation-arent-just-coming-from-above/
Freeland, J. (2013, December 2). Technology Tools Lag Our Competency- Based Aspirations. Retrieved from EducationNext: http://educationnext.org/technology-tools-lag-our-competency-based-aspirations/Print This Post